SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kikuyu Pipes and Fittings Centre Limited v Kiambu County Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services & another (Miscellaneous Application E194 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 177 (KLR) (29 January 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 177 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
177
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 177 (KLR)
Decided
29 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of enforcement of award and leave to object to award out of timeCoramBOM MANANI
Holding

The court grants the application for a temporary stay of enforcement of the 1st Respondent’s award pending the hearing and determination of the application, and grants leave to the Applicant to object to the 1st Respondent’s award out of time.

Facts

The Applicant, Kikuyu Pipes and Fittings Centre Limited, claims that its employee, Benard Kilonzo Kaleli, died in a road accident on June 11, 2023. The 1st Respondent, Kiambu County Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services, issued an award on January 29, 2025, finding the Applicant liable for compensation to the 2nd Respondent, Anastasiah Wairimu Mwaura (personal representative of the estate of Benard Kilonzo Kaleli). The Applicant contests the award, alleging bias and lack of proper investigation.

Issues

  1. Whether the 1st Respondent’s award should be stayed pending the hearing of the application
  2. Whether the Applicant should be granted leave to object to the 1st Respondent’s award out of time

Reasoning

The court finds that the 1st Respondent’s investigation was flawed and that the Applicant was denied an opportunity to be heard. The court also notes that the Applicant’s insurer delayed the process of lodging an objection to the award.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • Temporary stay of enforcement of the 1st Respondent’s award pending the hearing and determination of the application
  • Grant of leave to the Applicant to object to the 1st Respondent’s award out of time
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case