SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Wasonga v Mini Bakeries (Nairobi) Ltd (Appeal E008 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 225 (KLR) (29 January 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 225 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
225
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 225 (KLR)
Decided
29 January 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramLivestock Ltd Maureen Onyango, Madan, Maureen Onyango, Rika
The appeal is dismissed. The trial court's judgment is upheld.

Facts

The appellant, Benson Otieno Wasongo, was employed as a casual Painter by the respondent, Mini Bakeries (Nairobi) Ltd, from July 2015 to September 2021. The appellant claimed underpayment, unpaid salary arrears, and other benefits, while the respondent argued that the appellant absconded and was not entitled to the reliefs prayed for.

Issues

  • Appellant's entitlement to underpayment and unpaid salary arrears
  • Appellant's entitlement to other benefits
  • Whether termination of employment was fair

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant's evidence was insufficient to establish his entitlement to underpayment and unpaid salary arrears. The appellant's employment status was casual, and he did not meet the threshold of the Employment Act to claim term contract terms and conditions.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Hahn v Singh
  • Nimo Ali v Sagoo Radiators Ltd
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case