SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Century Furniture Limited v Kazungu (Appeal E185 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 229 (KLR) (29 January 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 229 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
229
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 229 (KLR)
Decided
29 January 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of Hon. J. B. KaloCoramM MBARŨ, J
The respondent is protected under section 37 of the Employment Act due to continuous employment beyond casual labor, and the trial court's findings are upheld.

Facts

The respondent claimed he was employed as a machine operator from March 2011, but was dismissed on September 1, 2023, without notice. He sought various terminal dues.

Issues

  • Whether the respondent was a casual employee under section 37 of the Employment Act
  • Whether the termination of employment was unfair and unlawful

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent was a protected casual employee under section 37 of the Act, and thus, the termination was unfair and unlawful.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed, and the trial court's judgment is upheld.

Orders

  • Notice pay and compensation are awarded
  • House allowance is not justified
  • Annual leave pay is awarded
  • Service pay is not due
  • Each party bears their costs for the appeal, with the respondent awarded costs for the trial court proceedings

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Kenyatta University v Thomas & 25 others
  • Kenyatta University v Maina
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case