Mindo v Kendu Adventist Hospital (Cause E028 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 23 (KLR) (20 January 2026) (Ruling)
- Court
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Case number
- 23
- Citation
- [2026] KEELRC 23 (KLR)
- Decided
- 20 January 2026
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLabor DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramNZIOKI WA MAKAU
Holding
The court allowed the production of the document marked as exhibit 9(b) as the witness is the author of the letter and competent to produce it.
Facts
The Claimant, Nashon O Mindo, is a former employee of the Respondent, Kendu Adventist Hospital. The Respondent objected to the production of a letter marked as exhibit 9(b) as it was not an original copy.
Issues
- Whether the document marked as exhibit 9(b) should be produced as evidence
- Whether the witness is competent to produce the document
Reasoning
The court noted the characteristics of the signature on the document corresponded with the known signature of the Claimant, and the witness was competent to produce the document.
Outcome
The document marked as exhibit 9(b) was allowed to be produced as evidence.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…