SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kemei & 2 others v Teachers Service Commission (Judicial Review Application E001 of 2026) [2026] KEELRC 428 (KLR) (20 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 428 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
428
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 428 (KLR)
Decided
20 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial Review ApplicationPostureRespondent's Application for Interim OrdersCoramJAMES RIKA
Holding

Interim ex parte orders cannot be granted as disciplinary and criminal proceedings are different processes. The Court needs to serve pleadings and hold a hearing with participation of all parties.

Facts

The Petitioners are Teachers employed by the Respondent Teachers Service Commission. They have been charged with obtaining money by false pretenses and acquisition of proceeds of crime at Bomet Chief Magistrate's Court. They are facing criminal proceedings and have been summoned to appear before an investigations panel for disciplinary action.

Issues

  1. Double jeopardy
  2. Irreparable damages
  3. Violation of constitutional right to fair hearing and administrative action

Reasoning

The Court finds that disciplinary and criminal proceedings are distinct and that the Teachers Service Commission Act and its regulations do not allow interim ex parte orders.

Outcome

Application dismissed. The application and pleadings shall be served upon the Respondent. The Respondent shall file and serve its response to the notice of motion within 14 days of service. Mention on 17th March 2026.

Orders

  • Serve the application and pleadings upon the Respondent
  • Respondent to file and serve its response to the notice of motion within 14 days of service
  • Mention on 17th March 2026

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Teachers Service Commission Act
  • Regulation 139 of The Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations For Teachers, 2015
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case