SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Whitesands Sarova Hotel Limited v Omburo (Appeal E007 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 436 (KLR) (19 February 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 436 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
436
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 436 (KLR)
Decided
19 February 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeAppealPostureAppeal from a judgment in a previous trialCoramM MBARŨ, J
The court held that the employment relationship was casual, and the respondent was not entitled to protections under the Employment Act, 2007. The termination was lawful under the repealed Employment Act, 1976.

Facts

The appellant, Whitesands Sarova Hotel Limited, terminated the respondent, Camlus Ochieng Omburo, as a storekeeper on July 31, 2001. The respondent claimed wrongful termination and other damages.

Issues

  • Nature of employment relationship
  • Unlawful termination of employment
  • Meritoriousness of the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The court reviewed the evidence and found that the Employment Act, 2007 did not apply due to the repealed status of the act. The court also noted that the respondent was a casual employee and thus not entitled to protections under the Employment Act, 2007.

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed, and the judgment is upheld.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The claim for terminal benefits, damages, and service charge is dismissed.
  • The claim for costs and interest is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act, 1976
  • Employment Act, 2007
Cases cited (5)
  • Mwau & 9 others v Excel Chemicals Limited
  • Rashid Odhiambo Ologgoh & 245 others v Haco Industries Limited
  • Were v Stang Africa Limited & another
  • Rashid Odhiambo Allogoh & 245 others v Haco Industries Limited
  • Tanui v National Police Service Commission & 2 others
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case