SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mativo v KCB Bank Kenya Limited (Cause E001 of 2021) [2026] KEELRC 492 (KLR) (19 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 492 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
492
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 492 (KLR)
Decided
19 February 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureClaimant seeks declaration of lawful employment, reinstatement, arrears, and compensation; Respondent defends dismissal as lawful due to gross misconductCoramOCHARO
Summary dismissal was procedurally unfair

Facts

Claimant was dismissed by Respondent on 17th October 2018 for gross misconduct. He was arrested and charged in court, but not convicted.

Issues

  • Whether summary dismissal was fair and lawful
  • Claimant's entitlement to reinstatement, arrears, and compensation

Reasoning

Procedural fairness was not observed; disciplinary proceedings were not initiated against the Claimant.

Outcome

Claimant's claim upheld

Orders

  • Declaration of procedural unfairness
  • One month's salary in lieu of notice
  • Six months' gross salary for compensation
  • Interest on awarded sums
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Declaration of procedural unfairness
  • Compensation for unfair dismissal
  • Interest on awarded sums

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Chief Registrar of the Judiciary &2 others LMN [2025] KESC 53 [KLR]
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case