SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kioko v Impel Tours & Safaris Limited (Employment and Labour Relations Cause 1198 of 2017) [2026] KEELRC 508 (KLR) (25 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 508 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
508
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 508 (KLR)
Decided
25 February 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureApplication for orders to lift corporate veil and hold directors personally liableCoramHS WASILWA
The corporate veil will be lifted to allow cross-examination of the directors to ascertain their assets and settle the debt.

Facts

The Claimant, Kioko, won a judgment in 2025 for unpaid leave, unremitted NSSF contributions, and costs. A decree was issued in 2024 for Kshs. 379,140. The Respondent, Impel Tours & Safaris Limited, has since shut down operations and claimed no attachable assets.

Issues

  • Whether the corporate veil of Impel Tours & Safaris Limited can be lifted to hold its directors personally liable for the decretal sum.
  • Whether the company's inability to meet financial obligations justifies lifting the corporate veil.

Reasoning

The court found that the company was being used to evade legal obligations and that the directors were deliberately evading their responsibilities. The court dismissed the application to lift the corporate veil as the evidence did not support the need to do so.

Outcome

Application granted, corporate veil lifted

Orders

  • Cross-examination of directors to ascertain assets of the company
  • Lifting of corporate veil to hold directors personally liable for the decretal sum

Remedies

  • Settlement of the decretal sum

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Companies Act, Cap 486 (now the Companies Act, 2015)
  • Insolvency Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case