SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbwiria v Biodeal Laboratories Limited (Cause E118 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 568 (KLR) (27 February 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 568 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
568
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 568 (KLR)
Decided
27 February 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from the original trialCoramSC RUTTO
The Court finds that the Respondent did not prove that the termination was valid and fair, and the Claimant was not afforded procedural fairness.

Facts

Claimant was employed as a Medical Representative by Respondent. She was terminated on August 5, 2024, for alleged neglect of duties. She claimed wrongful termination and sought compensation.

Issues

  • Whether the Respondent had a valid and fair reason for terminating the Claimant's employment
  • Whether the Claimant was afforded procedural fairness prior to termination
  • Whether the Claimant is entitled to the reliefs sought

Reasoning

The Court determined that the Respondent failed to prove the Claimant neglected her duties, and the Claimant was leading a team as of February 2023.

Outcome

The Court declared the termination unlawful and ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant Kshs 616,250.00 in compensation.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 616,250.00 in compensation

Remedies

  • Compensation of Kshs 616,250.00

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case