SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Rahman & 3 others v Daallo Airlines Limited (Cause E543, E542, E544 & E545 of 2021 (Consolidated)) [2026] KEELRC 62 (KLR) (23 January 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 62 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
62
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 62 (KLR)
Decided
23 January 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment DisputePostureAppeal from an original trial decisionCoramJustice Abuodha Jorum Nelson
Holding

The Court finds that the Claimants were constructively dismissed due to the Respondent's failure to pay their salaries and failure to honor a settlement agreement.

Facts

The Claimants were employed by the Respondent in various positions from 2006 to 2017. The Respondent failed to pay their salaries between 2018 and 2019, leading to a suspension and a settlement agreement that was not honored.

Issues

  1. Whether the Claimants were constructively terminated by the Respondent.
  2. Whether the Claimants were entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The indefinite suspension and the settlement agreement that was not honored led to the conclusion that the Claimants were constructively dismissed. The court also found that the non-payment of salaries was a significant breach of the employment contract.

Outcome

The Claimants were found to be constructively dismissed and entitled to the reliefs sought.

Remedies

  • Compensation for unfair termination of employment.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (4)
  • Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
  • Coca Cola East & Central Africa Ltd v Maria Kagai Ligaga
  • Metto v Mediheal Group of Hospitals
  • Nyabuti v East African Safari Express Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case