SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Odongo v County Government of Taita Taveta & 2 others (Employment and Labour Relations Petition E006 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 643 (KLR) (26 February 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 643 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
643
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 643 (KLR)
Decided
26 February 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeEmployment and Labour Relations PetitionPostureRespondents' preliminary objection dismissedCoramJUSTICE OCHARO KEBIRA
Holding

The preliminary objection raised by the Respondents is dismissed.

Facts

The Petitioner filed a petition alleging a violation of his constitutional rights due to a notification of retirement. The Respondents raised a preliminary objection, but the Court found it to be improperly taken.

Issues

  1. whether the preliminary objection is properly taken
  2. whether the petition is time-barred

Reasoning

The Court held that the timing of the cause of action regarding the instant dispute is highly contested and cannot be determined without examining documentary evidence. The law is settled that claims founded on alleged infringement of constitutional guarantees are not barred by the time limitation stipulated in the Employment Act.

Outcome

The Petition is not dismissed due to the preliminary objection.

Orders

  • The Respondents' preliminary objection is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Employment Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Ndueyira v Inspector General of police and 3 others [2023] KEELRC 2092[ KLR]
  • Francis Kimani Kiige vs The National Hospital Insurance Fund- Court of Appeal, Civil Appeal No. 657 of 2019
  • Francis Mwangi Wariahe v Teachers Service Commission [2017] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case