SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Morara Apiemi & Nyangito Advocates v Nyamanyara (Appeal E168 of 2021) [2026] KEELRC 685 (KLR) (11 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 685 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
685
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 685 (KLR)
Decided
11 March 2026
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureAppeal from an order of the Employment and Labour Relations CourtCoramMN NDUMA, Nyagaka
Holding

The application is misconceived and lacks merit, and is dismissed with no order as to costs

Facts

The Respondent/Applicant filed a notice of motion application seeking to vary and set aside an order marking the appeal as settled and closed, and to order the Appellant/Respondent to bear the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings. The application was premised on the grounds that the Appellant had no prior knowledge and did not consent to the settlement, and that the matter was just pending judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the court's order marking the appeal as settled and closed was valid
  2. Whether the issue of costs was adequately addressed in the proceedings

Reasoning

The court found that the issue of costs was not a new matter and was in the knowledge of the parties from the filing of pleadings through the hearing and determination of the case. The court also found that the Advocate for the Applicant had full instructions to have the matter marked as settled.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Silas Wanyonyi Mukhabi v John Kitui Wanyonyi (2022) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case