SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyanchama v Sotik Tea Company Ltd (Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2024) [2026] KEELRC 717 (KLR) (12 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 717 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
717
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 717 (KLR)
Decided
12 March 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent opposed the applicationCoramAN MWAURE, Radido
The court grants the applicant leave to file her claim out of time

Facts

Mary Nyanchama was employed by Sotik Tea Company Ltd as a handplucker from October 2004 until her termination on 4th March 2020 due to illness. She sought leave to file her claim out of time due to late payment of dues.

Issues

  • Whether the application is merited
  • Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing suit out of time

Reasoning

The court considers the Employment Act and the case of Josephat Ndirangu v Henkel Chemicals (EA) Ltd, holding that the cause of action was from when she received her terminal dues, and grants leave to file within 14 days.

Outcome

The court grants the applicant leave to file her claim out of time

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file her claim within the next 14 days

Remedies

  • Costs will be in the cause

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Employment Act
  • Limitation of Actions Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Josephat Ndirangu v Henkel Chemicals (EA) Ltd
  • Francis Kimani Kiige v National Hospital Insurance Fund
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case