SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Migiro & 15 others v Registered Trustees National Council of Churches of Kenya & another (Cause E175 of 2021) [2026] KEELRC 788 (KLR) (19 March 2026) (Ruling)

[2026] KEELRC 788 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
788
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 788 (KLR)
Decided
19 March 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment & Labour RelationsPostureApplication for review of judgmentCoramC. N. BAARI
The court finds the application merited and reviews its judgment, awarding compensation for unlawful termination and compliant certificates of service.

Facts

The Claimants were terminated by redundancy and sought compensation for unlawful and unfair termination. The court initially found the termination unfair but did not award compensation.

Issues

  • Whether the court's finding on compensation for unfair termination was correct
  • Whether the court's judgment should be reviewed

Reasoning

The court held that the omission of compensation for unfair termination was a factual error on the face of the record, and the judgment should be reviewed.

Outcome

Application granted, judgment reviewed

Orders

  • Compensation of 7 months' salary for unfair termination
  • Issue compliant Certificates of Service

Remedies

  • Compensation for unlawful termination
  • Compliant Certificates of Service

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Employment Act
  • Procedure Rules No.133 of 2024
Cases cited (2)
  • National Bank of Kenya Ltd v Ndungu Njau
  • Nyamogo & Nyamogo Advocates v Kogo
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case