SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

GA Insurance Limited v Kuria (Cause E432 of 2025) [2026] KEELRC 861 (KLR) (13 March 2026) (Judgment)

[2026] KEELRC 861 (KLR) Employment & Labour Relations Court
Read PDF
Court
Employment & Labour Relations Court
Case number
861
Citation
[2026] KEELRC 861 (KLR)
Decided
13 March 2026
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeEmployment and Labour RelationsPostureClaimant's undefended causeCoramSTELLA RUTTO
The Court finds that the Claimant, as the insurer, is entitled to recover from the Respondent the compensation it paid arising from the Director's award together with the attendant costs.

Facts

The deceased, George Kibutha Kamau, was an employee of Bbrood Kenya Limited who died in a road traffic accident involving motor vehicle registration number KAJ 699D, driven by the Respondent, Kelvin Kuria. The Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services assessed and awarded compensation to the deceased's dependants in the sum of Kshs 2,304,000.00. The Claimant, GA Insurance Limited, settled the Director's award and a last expense claim of Kshs 100,000.00.

Issues

  • Whether the Claimant's claim is merited under Section 17(1)(b) of the Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA)

Reasoning

The Court applies Section 17(1)(b) of WIBA to the circumstances of this case, finding that the Claimant is entitled to recover the compensation paid to the deceased's estate.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the Claimant for the sum of Kshs 2,427,985.00 against the Respondent.

Orders

  • Award the sum of Kshs 2,427,985.00 against the Respondent.
  • The Respondent shall also bear the costs of the suit.

Remedies

  • Reimbursement of the amount pursuant to Section 17(1)(b) of WIBA.
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case