SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MCM v BOO [2019] KEHAT 18 (KLR)

[2019] KEHAT 18 (KLR) KEHAT
Read PDF
Court
KEHAT
Case number
18
Citation
[2019] KEHAT 18 (KLR)
Decided
29 November 2019
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypecivilPostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramMativo
Holding

The claimant failed to prove her claim and the case is dismissed.

Facts

The claimant (MCM) alleged that the respondent (BOO) had violated her privacy rights under the Health Act (HAPCA) by not adhering to privacy guidelines.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent has violated the claimant's privacy rights under HAPCA
  2. Whether the claimant has met the burden of proof

Reasoning

The court found that the claimant did not meet the reasonable standards required to prove her claim and thus did not discharge her burden of proof.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Each party bears their own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Privacy Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case