SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

SW v MBM (Tribunal Case 3 of 2024) [2025] KEHAT 7 (KLR) (Civ) (6 February 2025) (Judgment)

[2025] KEHAT 7 (KLR) KEHAT
Read PDF
Court
KEHAT
Case number
7
Citation
[2025] KEHAT 7 (KLR)
Decided
6 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureClaimant's Motion for Orders and Reliefs
Holding

The Tribunal finds that the Respondent unlawfully disclosed the Claimant’s HIV status to third parties without his consent, and that the Claimant suffered stigmatization and discrimination as a result.

Facts

The Claimant, SW, alleged that the Respondent, MBM, unlawfully disclosed his HIV status to third parties without his consent. The Respondent also posted pictures of the Claimant on social media with captions indicating his HIV status.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent unlawfully disclosed the Claimant’s HIV status to third parties without the Claimant’s consent
  2. Whether as a result of the unlawful disclosure, the Claimant suffered stigmatization and/or discrimination as described in the HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act

Reasoning

The Tribunal relied on section 22 of the HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act, which prohibits the disclosure of HIV status without consent. The Tribunal found that the Respondent’s actions violated this provision and led to stigmatization and discrimination.

Outcome

The Respondent is ordered to cease and desist from disclosing the Claimant’s HIV status and to pay damages for the violation of his rights.

Orders

  • An order for the Respondent to cease and desist from disclosing the Claimant’s HIV status and treatment-related information
  • An award of damages for the violation of the Claimant’s rights

Remedies

  • An award of damages for the violation of the Claimant’s rights

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Act Cap 246A
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case