SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ROBERT EZEKIEL CHERUIYOT vs KENYA CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERIES LTD [1998] KEHC 237 (KLR)

[1998] KEHC 237 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
237
Citation
[1998] KEHC 237 (KLR)
Decided
13 November 1998
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a previous order dismissing the plaintiff's application to vacate the suit and restraining the plaintiff from evicting the defendant.CoramMBOGHOLI MSAGHA
Holding

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to vacate the suit and restrain the defendant from evicting him. The court found no error apparent on the face of the order and rejected the application for review.

Facts

The plaintiff and defendant were involved in two consolidated suits. The plaintiff applied to vacate the suit and restrain the defendant from evicting him, but the court dismissed the application on October 28, 1998.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's application to vacate the suit and restrain the defendant from evicting him was properly dismissed.
  2. Whether the court erred in not extending the period within which the plaintiff should vacate the suit premises.

Reasoning

The court ruled that the plaintiff's application was not improperly dismissed and that there was no error apparent on the face of the order. The court also noted that the application for eviction was not argued separately.

Outcome

The court dismissed the plaintiff's application.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's application for eviction was dismissed.
  • The defendant was ordered to vacate the suit premises within 7 days from the date of the order.
  • The plaintiff was restrained from evicting the defendant until the application is heard and finalised.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case