SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

NJENGA KARANJA v TRANS AMI TRANPORTERS (K) LTD [1999] KEHC 43 (KLR)

[1999] KEHC 43 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
43
Citation
[1999] KEHC 43 (KLR)
Decided
4 October 1999
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAssessment of DamagesCoramR NAMBUYE
Holding

The court finds that the plaintiff sustained injuries including a deformed shortened right lower limb, pain when walking, and other soft tissue injuries. The court assesses the damages and enters judgment accordingly.

Facts

The plaintiff, NJENGA KARANJA, sustained injuries in an accident involving the defendant, TRANS AMI TRANSPORTERS (K) LTD. The injuries included loss of consciousness, a cut on the left palm, fractures of the right leg and thigh, and bruises on the left leg. The plaintiff felt pain when walking and had not been hospitalized since February 5, 1996.

Issues

  1. Liability and percentage of fault
  2. Quantification of damages

Reasoning

The court considered the plaintiff's injuries, the case law cited, and the plaintiff's testimony to determine the appropriate damages.

Outcome

In favor of the plaintiff

Orders

  • Special damages of Kshs 1,820 with interest
  • General damages of Kshs 525,000 with interest
  • Costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities
  • Damages for special damages

Authorities cited

Cases cited (6)
  • Solomon W. Njoroge v Anne W. Mwangi
  • Francis Ngena Mutuli v John Kitheka Kwara
  • Benta Oyaga Oduwo v Keribigo General Stores Limited
  • Marco Nyagowa v Benson Mwangi Macharia
  • Makau Mulwa v Harriner Singh Kular
  • Raphael Mutuku v Samuel Ngare
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case