SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

TULIP APARTMENTS LIMITED v SOUTHERN CREDIT BANKING CORPORATION LTD [2000] KEHC 180 (KLR)

[2000] KEHC 180 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
180
Citation
[2000] KEHC 180 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for restraining ordersCoramKasanga Mulwa
Holding

The application is refused with costs to the Bank.

Facts

Tulip Apartments Limited applied for financial facilities from Southern Credit Banking Corporation Ltd. A charge and mortgage were duly prepared and executed. Tulip defaulted in payment, and the Bank sought to realize the security by giving a statutory notice and instructing auctioneers to proceed with the sale.

Issues

  1. Whether the mortgage/charge was registered within the 42 days required by Section 96 of the Companies Act
  2. Whether the rate of interest charged by the Bank is too high
  3. Whether innocent purchasers have acquired interest in the charged property
  4. Whether the timing of the auction was wrong

Reasoning

The mortgage/charge was registered within the 42 days allowed under Section 96 of the Companies Act. The court found that Tulip has not satisfied the conditions for granting an injunction.

Outcome

Application refused

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Companies Act (Cap. 486 Laws of Kenya)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case