SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

DAVID MONDE NGUTHI vs JASWINDER SINGH ENTERPRISES & WILFRED WAKABA NJAU [2001] KEHC 456 (KLR)

[2001] KEHC 456 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
456
Citation
[2001] KEHC 456 (KLR)
Decided
19 September 2001
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from the original trialCoramJ. W. Mwera
Holding

The court finds the defendants 100% liable for the plaintiff's injuries. The court awards Sh. 400,000/= in general damages, Sh. 415,437/= in medical and related expenses, Sh. 145,000/= in loss of the motor vehicle, and Sh. 3,100/= in special damages. The total award is Sh. 963,537/=. The plaintiff gets costs and interest.

Facts

The plaintiff, David Monde Nguthi, was involved in a road accident with the defendant's vehicle on March 16, 1996. The plaintiff suffered multiple injuries including a concussion, a deep cut in the right eye, fractures in the right femur and right upper shoulder, and cuts on the face and ankle. He was unable to resume his duties as a civil servant and needed future medical attention and nursing care.

Issues

  1. liability of the defendants for the plaintiff's injuries
  2. amount of general damages
  3. amount of special damages
  4. amount of medical and related expenses
  5. amount of loss of the motor vehicle
  6. amount of costs and interest

Reasoning

The court finds the defendants liable for the plaintiff's injuries, citing the plaintiff's testimony and the police abstract. The court awards damages based on the plaintiff's medical reports and the amount of medical expenses.

Outcome

The plaintiff wins the case and is awarded a total of Sh. 963,537/=. The plaintiff also gets costs and interest.

Orders

  • The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff Sh. 963,537/= in damages.
  • The plaintiff is awarded costs and interest.

Remedies

  • Damages of Sh. 963,537/=

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • PETER KINGORI & ANR. VS. KAGIRI & ANOTHER NRI HCC C 2916/99
  • RHODA MBENJE VS. IKIARA MRU HCCC 74/96
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case