SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

ADEL MOHAMMED ABDULKADER AL-DAHAS v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANOTHER [2003] KEHC 18 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 18 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
18
Citation
[2003] KEHC 18 (KLR)
Decided
10 December 2003
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeHabeas CorpusPostureApplication for Directions in the Nature of Habeas CorpusCoramB.P. KUBO
Holding

The court ordered the 1st respondent to appear in person or by advocate with the original of any warrant or order for the detention of the applicant to show cause why the applicant should not be released forthwith. The respondents were also directed to hand over the applicant to the interested party, the UNHCR, forthwith.

Facts

The applicant, Adel Mohammed Abdulkader Al-Dahas, is an Iraqi national who has been unlawfully detained in police custody for an inordinately long period without charge. He claims refugee status and argues that he should be in the custody of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Issues

  1. Unlawful detention
  2. Refugee status
  3. Fundamental rights
  4. Violation of Constitution and international human rights instruments

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant's detention was unlawful and that he has already been accorded refugee status by the UNHCR. The court ruled in favor of the applicant's release and handed him over to the UNHCR.

Outcome

Granted

Orders

  • Summon the 1st respondent to appear in person or by advocate with the original of any warrant or order for the detention of the applicant to show cause why the applicant should not be released forthwith.
  • Hand over the applicant to the interested party, the UNHCR, forthwith.

Remedies

  • Release of the applicant
  • Handing over the applicant to the UNHCR

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75)
  • Criminal Procedure (Directions in the Nature of Habeas Corpus) Rules
  • High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case