SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

TERESIA CHELAGAT TUWEI & ANOTHER v ALBERT SAINA [2003] KEHC 34 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 34 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
34
Citation
[2003] KEHC 34 (KLR)
Decided
30 April 2003
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a decision of the Principal Magistrate Kapsabet dismissing an application for review and setting aside a decreeCoramA.G. ETYANG
Holding

The appeal is allowed, the orders of the Principal Magistrate dismissing the application are set aside, and the decree is set aside with all consequential orders.

Facts

The appellants and the respondent had a land dispute over L.R. Nandi/Ndubeneti/63. The Kilibwoni Land Disputes Tribunal awarded the respondent 1.5 acres of the land. The Principal Magistrate Kapsabet issued decrees confirming the award. The appellants later moved for review, but the Principal Magistrate dismissed the application. The appellants appealed this dismissal.

Issues

  1. Whether the amendment of the decree was valid
  2. Whether the appellants were properly served with notice for the amendment

Reasoning

The amendment of the decree was invalid as it was not done through an application for review supported by an affidavit. The appellants were not properly served with notice for the amendment.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The orders of the Principal Magistrate of 6th July 2000 dismissing the application dated 27th April 2000 are set aside
  • The said application is now reinstated and prayers therein are granted
  • The decree purported to have been amended and re-issued on 28th August 1997 is hereby set aside
  • The decree dated 17th July 1997 is hereby reinstated

Remedies

  • The appellants are awarded the costs of the appeal
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case