SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KENGA LOLO MGALLA vs REPUBLIC [2003] KEHC 915 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 915 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
915
Citation
[2003] KEHC 915 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from original conviction and sentenceCoramA.G.A. Etyang
Holding

The default imprisonment term of three years is set aside and substituted by six months imprisonment.

Facts

The appellant was convicted of grievous harm and sentenced to three years imprisonment, but was only able to serve one year due to inability to pay the fine. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act No.5 of 2003 was enacted, changing the default imprisonment term for fines from twelve months to six months.

Issues

  1. The validity of the three years imprisonment sentence in default of payment of the fine
  2. The applicability of the amended Criminal Law (Amendment) Act No.5 of 2003

Reasoning

The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act No.5 of 2003 amended Section 28 of the Penal Code, changing the default imprisonment term for fines from twelve months to six months.

Outcome

Appeal upheld, sentence reduced from three years to six months imprisonment.

Orders

  • The default imprisonment term of three years is set aside and substituted by six months imprisonment

Remedies

  • The appellant is hereby released from prison unless he is otherwise lawfully held

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Penal Code
  • Criminal Law (Amendment) Act No.5 of 2003
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case