SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Zakayo Kagombe Nderu v Kenya National Chamber of Commerce & Industry & another [2003] KEHC 934 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 934 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
934
Citation
[2003] KEHC 934 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for mandatory injunctions and restraining ordersCoramJ.W. ONYANGO OTIENO
Holding

Prayer 3 granted, prayers 4 and 5 dismissed.

Facts

The applicant was a member of the Kenya National Chamber of Commerce until February 5, 2003, when his membership was terminated. He filed a suit and application seeking reinstatement of his membership and other orders.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has locus standi to sue the respondents.
  2. Whether the termination of the applicant's membership was procedurally fair.
  3. Whether the applicant's rights have been infringed.
  4. Whether the applicant is entitled to mandatory injunctions and restraining orders.

Reasoning

The court found that the termination of the applicant's membership was procedurally unfair and granted the mandatory injunction to reinstate his membership. The court dismissed prayers 4 and 5 due to lack of evidence and laches.

Outcome

Prayer 3 granted, prayers 4 and 5 dismissed, respondent to bear one-third of the costs.

Orders

  • A mandatory injunction to compel the first defendant to reinstate the applicant's membership in the first defendant pending the hearing of his suit.
  • An injunction to restrain the first defendant from demanding and collecting the annual subscription fee from the plaintiff pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
  • An injunction to restrain the second defendant from discharging and executing his duties as a Chairman of the first defendant Mombasa branch pending the hearing of the suit.

Remedies

  • Reinstatement of membership
  • Prohibitory injunctions
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case