SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Madhupaper International Ltd & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd & 2 others [2003] KEHC 991 (KLR)

[2003] KEHC 991 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
991
Citation
[2003] KEHC 991 (KLR)
Decided
23 January 2003
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeRestitutionary ClaimPostureAppeal from the original trial outcomeCoramR.C.N. KULOBRA
Holding

The plaintiffs' suit succeeds against all three defendants, and the Court awards judgment for the plaintiffs to recover Shs 56 million with interest and costs.

Facts

The plaintiffs, Madhupaper International Ltd and another, claim a sum of Shs 56,000,000 from the defendants, Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd and two others, on the principle of unjust enrichment due to duress and coercive pressure. The extra sum of Shs 56 million was paid in circumstances of debt owed to the defendants.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment is valid
  2. Whether the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the unjust enrichment

Reasoning

The plaintiffs' claim is based on unjust enrichment due to duress and coercive pressure, and the extra sum was paid in circumstances of debt owed to the defendants. The defendants knew of the duress and benefited from it.

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of Shs 56,000,000 with interest and costs.

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiffs in the sum of Shs 56,000,000 with interest and costs

Remedies

  • Recovery of Shs 56,000,000 with interest and costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (7)
  • Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd
  • Saleh bin Ghaleb v Hussein al Qu’aiti
  • Chase International Investment Corporation and another v Laxman Keshra and others
  • Riddoch Motors Ltd v Coast Region Co-op
  • Zakayo v Naomi
  • Barton
  • Crescendo
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case