SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Njuguna v Cheteka & another [2004] KEHC 1231 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 1231 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1231
Citation
[2004] KEHC 1231 (KLR)
Decided
24 November 2004
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication to set aside warrant of arrest and set costs claimCoramL. KIMARU, AG. JUDGE
Holding

The warrant of arrest issued on the 8th of July 2004 and reissued on the 12th of October 2004 is set aside. The Plaintiff is barred from executing against the 1st Defendant in respect of the costs awarded. The Plaintiff should claim the said costs from the 2nd Defendant (Attorney General).

Facts

The Plaintiff sued the 1st Defendant (then OCS Subukia Police Station) and the Attorney General for criminal proceedings brought against him. The Plaintiff was successful and the Defendants were ordered to pay costs.

Issues

  1. Can a public officer acting in his official capacity be made personally liable for costs ordered by the court?
  2. Who should be liable for the costs awarded to the Plaintiff?

Reasoning

The Government Proceedings Act protects public servants from being personally liable for costs ordered by the court. The 1st Defendant acted within the scope of his employment and cannot be held personally liable for the costs.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • Warrant of arrest set aside
  • Plaintiff barred from executing against 1st Defendant for costs awarded
  • Plaintiff to claim costs from 2nd Defendant

Remedies

  • Set aside warrant of arrest
  • Barred from executing against 1st Defendant for costs awarded

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case