SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

LABAN MUKANGAI & another v SIMON MUSEVE [2004] KEHC 141 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 141 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
141
Citation
[2004] KEHC 141 (KLR)
Decided
15 October 2004
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a ruling of the District Magistrate dismissing an application to set aside an ex parte judgmentCoramG.B.M. KARIUKI
Holding

The appeal is allowed, and the order of the lower court dismissing the appellants' application to set aside the ex parte judgment is set aside. The appellants are given an opportunity to be heard on merit as there are triable issues disclosed by their statement of defense.

Facts

The appellants were sued for dissolution of marriage and refund of dowry. The appellants applied to set aside the ex parte judgment due to improper service of summons.

Issues

  1. Whether the lower court was right in dismissing the appellants' application to set aside the ex parte judgment and decree.
  2. Whether the lower court erred in not considering the appellants' intended defense raised triable issues.

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretionary power to set aside the ex parte judgment because the appellants had shown they had a reasonable defense on the merits, despite the regularity of the judgment.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order allowing the application to set aside and giving the appellants 30 days within which to appear and file defense

Remedies

  • The thrown away costs shall abide the result of the suit in the lower court.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Philip Keptoo Chemwolo and another versus Augustine Kubede, C.A. Civil Appeal No. 103 of 1984 (unreported)
  • Tree Shade Motors Ltd versus D.T. Dobie & Co. (K) Ltd. C.A. Civil Appeal No. 38 of 1998 (unreported)
  • Kingsway Tyres and Automart Ltd versus Rafiki enterprises Ltd(C.A. Civil Appeal No. 220 of 1995, un reported)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case