SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kabita Kibotho v Elias Njagi Njoka & anor [2004] KEHC 1550 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 1550 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1550
Citation
[2004] KEHC 1550 (KLR)
Decided
28 February 2004
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLand Ownership DisputePostureAppeal from a High Court judgmentCoramH. M. OKWENGU
Holding

The Plaintiff's claim is upheld, and the land is vested in the Plaintiff. A perpetual injunction is issued to prevent the Defendants from interfering with the Plaintiff's possession.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Kabita Kibotho, claimed ownership of land parcel NGARIAMA/NGIRIAMBU/58, which was registered in the name of his elder brother Mbire Kibotho. The Defendants, Elias Njagi Njoka and Phyllis Micere Kubuta, claimed the land was theirs. The Plaintiff alleged continuous and uninterrupted occupation of the land for over 12 years.

Issues

  1. Ownership of land parcel NGARIAMA/NGIRIAMBU/58
  2. Validity of the Defendants' claim to the land

Reasoning

The court found that the Plaintiff had been in continuous and uninterrupted occupation of the land for over 12 years, contrary to the Defendants' claim. The Plaintiff's possession was adverse to Mbire Kibotho's rights, and Mbire Kibotho's title to the land was extinguished after 12 years.

Outcome

Plaintiff's claim successful

Orders

  • Vesting order vesting the suit land upon the Plaintiff
  • Perpetual injunction issued to prevent interference with the Plaintiff's possession

Remedies

  • Vesting of the suit land in the Plaintiff
  • Perpetual injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Limitation of Actions Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Benjamin Kamau Murima and others vs Gladys Njeri C A Civil Appeal 213 of 1996
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case