SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Waki Holdings Ltd v Jane Mbiro Karukenya [2004] KEHC 647 (KLR)

[2004] KEHC 647 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
647
Citation
[2004] KEHC 647 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the High Court of Kenya at EmbuCoramLENAOLA
Holding

The title as held by Waki Holdings Ltd is intact and the remedy left to the aggrieved family of Karukenya is one in damages.

Facts

Waki Holdings Ltd purchased land parcel L.R. No. Kagaari/Kanja/997 at a public auction conducted by Kenya Commercial Bank Limited on behalf of the deceased Vincent Karukenya. The widow of the deceased, Jane Mbiro Karukenya, denied the auction and claimed the takeover of her home was illegal.

Issues

  1. Whether the title issued to Waki Holdings Ltd is valid and enforceable
  2. Whether the Plaintiff (Waki Holdings Ltd) can be ordered to vacate the land in default of the Defendant (Jane Mbiro Karukenya)

Reasoning

The Court held that the title issued to Waki Holdings Ltd is valid and enforceable, and that the Plaintiff can be ordered to vacate the land in default of the Defendant.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs

Orders

  • The Application dated 7th May 2003 is hereby allowed with no order as to costs
  • The suit herein be fixed for hearing on a priority basis for 2 successive days in the month of November 2004 on a date to be agreed at the Registry

Remedies

  • Damages for the aggrieved family of Karukenya
  • Eviction of Waki Holdings Ltd from the land in default of the Defendant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Registered Land Act, Cap. 300
  • Transfer of Property Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Ze Yu Yang vs Nova Industrial Products Ltd
  • Downhill Ltd vs Harith Ali Al-Busaidy C.A 254/1999
  • Mayers and Another vs Akira Ranch Ltd (No.3) [1973] E.A 431
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case