SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

CMC Motors Group v Reuben Wanyonyi Simiyu [2005] KEHC 1275 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 1275 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1275
Citation
[2005] KEHC 1275 (KLR)
Decided
3 October 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication to transfer suit from Kitale Senior Principal Magistrate's Court to Nakuru Chief Magistrate's CourtCoramWaki J
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs. The suit shall be heard and determined where it was properly filed by the respondent.

Facts

The contract of sale of a motor vehicle was entered into at Nakuru, but part of the purchase consideration was paid at Kitale. The respondent filed the suit in Kitale Senior Principal Magistrate's Court.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent filed the suit in the correct court.
  2. Whether the applicant can have the suit transferred to a venue of its choice and convenience.

Reasoning

Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Act, Explanation 2, states that a corporation shall be deemed to carry on business at its sole or principal office in Kenya or in respect of any cause of action arising at any place where it has also a subordinate office, at such place. The applicant has branch offices at Nakuru and Kitale, and the contract was entered into at Nakuru but part of the consideration was paid at Kitale. The respondent could file the suit in either court. The applicant's application lacks basis in law.

Outcome

Dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Kitale SPMCCC No. 565 of 2005 (Reuben Wanyonyi Simiyu –vs- CMC Motors Group Ltd) shall be heard and determined where it was properly filed by the respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Nairobi HC Misc Appl. No. 10 of 2002 Akamba Public Road Services Ltd –vs- Emily Caroline Barassa (unreported)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case