SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ashioya & Co Advocates v Joab Rogers Wafula [2005] KEHC 1284 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 1284 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1284
Citation
[2005] KEHC 1284 (KLR)
Decided
8 April 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent seeks to have time enlarged and a stay of recovery proceedings of taxed costsCoramJ. K. SERGON
Holding

The chamber summons dated 4th October, 2004 is allowed. The respondent is granted leave of 7 days to comply with the provisions of paragraph 11 (1) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order. There be a stay of execution of recovery of taxed costs pending the filing of the intended objection pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 11(3) of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order.

Facts

Respondent filed a summons under Advocates (Remuneration) Order seeking to have time enlarged by 7 days to serve notice to the taxing officer and a stay of recovery proceedings of taxed costs. He argued it was an excusable mistake due to lack of legal advice.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent is likely to suffer substantial loss if an order of stay of execution is not granted.
  2. Whether the respondent should deposit the sum which is not disputed.

Reasoning

The court finds the respondent likely to suffer substantial loss if an order of stay of execution is not granted. The court grants the stay of execution pending the filing of the intended objection.

Outcome

The chamber summons is allowed.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the respondent to have time enlarged by 7 days to serve notice to the taxing officer.
  • Stay of execution of recovery of taxed costs pending the filing of the intended objection.

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of recovery of taxed costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Advocates (Remuneration) Order
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case