SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Francis Muriuki M’Ibere v Maungo Njuruitha [2005] KEHC 1676 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 1676 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1676
Citation
[2005] KEHC 1676 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
Typecivil appealPostureappeal from a decree and order of the District CourtCoramD. A. ONYANCHA
Holding

The court held that the respondent has a right to a permanent injunction against the appellant to prevent him from trespassing on his land.

Facts

The respondent filed a plaint in the lower court claiming a permanent injunction against the appellant to prevent him from trespassing on his land. The respondent alleged that the disputed land measuring 1.4 acres was part of his land, L.R. No. Abogeta/Upper Kithangari/531, and that it was separated from the appellant's land, L.R. No. Abogeta/Upper Kithangari/130, by a road of access. The appellant admitted that L.R. No. Abogeta/Upper Kithangari/531 was registered in his name but claimed that the disputed land belonged to him through his deceased father, who was the registered owner of L.R. No. Abogeta/Upper Kithangari/130.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent has a right to a permanent injunction against the appellant to prevent him from trespassing on his land.
  2. Whether the appellant's claim for the rectification of the boundaries of the disputed land is valid.

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent had a right to the permanent injunction as the disputed land was part of his registered land and the appellant had no legal claim to it.

Outcome

The court granted the respondent a permanent injunction.

Orders

  • The court granted the respondent a permanent injunction against the appellant to prevent him from trespassing on his land.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case