SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Commercial Bank v David Kiprono Ruto [2005] KEHC 2051 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2051 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2051
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2051 (KLR)
Decided
13 May 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a ruling of the subordinate court restraining the appellant from disposing, alienating or dealing in any way with L.R. No. KERICHO/KIPCHIMCHIM/2840.CoramJ.K. SERGON
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. The Deputy Registrar is directed to forward the subordinate court's file to Kericho Principal Magistrate's court so that the suit may be heard and determined expeditiously by that court.

Facts

David Kiprono Ruto was employed by Kenya Commercial Bank as a clerical staff. He applied for financial facilities and pledged his title number KERICHO/KIPCHIMCHIM/2840 as security. The loan was converted to public section after his resignation, prompting the bank to issue a notice to repay the outstanding loan. Ruto filed a suit for an injunction to restrain the bank from selling his land.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in granting an order of injunction.
  2. Whether the statutory power of sale vested in the appellant had arisen.

Reasoning

The trial court did not consider the principles of injunction set out in GIELLA VS CASSMAN BROWN Supra. The notice issued by the appellant in which a copy has been annexed to the affidavit of the Respondent does not comply with the provisions of S. 74 (1) of the Registered Land Act.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
  • The Deputy Registrar is directed to forward the subordinate court's file to Kericho Principal Magistrate's court so that the suit may be heard and determined expeditiously by that court.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Registered Land Act Cap. 300 Laws of Kenya
  • Section 74 of the Registered Land Act
Cases cited (1)
  • GIELLA VS CASSMAN BROWN (1973) E.A. 358
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case