SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KIPSUGUT ARAP CHEPSIROR v KIPKURGAT CHEPSIROR AND OTHERS [2005] KEHC 2255 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2255 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2255
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2255 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPostureApplication for confirmation of grant of letters of administrationCoramGeorge Dulu, Ag. Judge
Holding

Letters of administration were confirmed on 8th February 1988, and the subject land (L. R. NAND/LESSOS/35) should be divided equally among the five houses.

Facts

The deceased was married to five wives, and the estate includes a piece of land (L. R. NAND/LESSOS/35) to be divided equally among the five houses. There was also a parcel of land (NANDI/LESSOS/46) registered in the deceased's name, which the objectors claimed was not part of the estate.

Issues

  1. Confirmation of letters of administration on 10th February 1988
  2. Lawfulness of letters of administration issued on 11th December 1987
  3. Inclusion of land parcel NANDI/LESSOS/46 in the estate
  4. Inclusion of David Tangut as a beneficiary

Reasoning

The court found that the letters of administration were confirmed on 8th February 1988, and the issue of the validity of the initial grant was not raised until now. The court dismissed the objections and confirmed the letters of administration.

Outcome

Letters of administration confirmed, land to be divided equally among the five houses.

Orders

  • Letters of administration confirmed to Kipsugut arap Chepsiror
  • Each of the five houses gets an equal share of the land L.R. NANDI/LESSOS/35

Remedies

  • Costs to be borne by the parties

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Law of Succession Act (Cap.160 Laws of Kenya)
  • Probate and Administration Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case