SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lemongen Lekomoisa & another v Republic [2005] KEHC 2282 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2282 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2282
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2282 (KLR)
Decided
29 June 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from conviction and sentence on three counts of robbery with violenceCoramD.A. ONYANCHA, RUTH N. SITATI
Holding

The 2nd appellant’s appeal is allowed in its entirety, and the 1st appellant’s appeal is allowed with respect to retrial.

Facts

Lemongen Lekomoisa and Tiwa Lebulukash were tried and convicted of robbery with violence. The 1st appellant was found guilty on counts 1, 2, and 3, while the 2nd appellant was acquitted on count 1 and found guilty on counts 2 and 3.

Issues

  1. Insufficiency of evidence
  2. Identification parade reliability
  3. Prosecutor qualification
  4. Stolen property possession

Reasoning

The court found insufficient evidence to support the conviction of the 2nd appellant and ordered his release. The court allowed the 1st appellant’s appeal and ordered a retrial.

Outcome

The 2nd appellant’s conviction and sentence are quashed. The 1st appellant’s convictions on counts 1, 2, and 3 are quashed, and the sentences are set aside. The case against the 1st appellant is ordered to go back for retrial.

Orders

  • The 2nd appellant is released from prison.
  • The 1st appellant’s convictions and sentences are quashed.
  • The case against the 1st appellant is ordered to go back for retrial in the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Isiolo with a different magistrate hearing the case.

Remedies

  • Quashing of convictions and sentences
  • Order for retrial

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code (C.P.C.)
  • Judges' Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case