SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Odema James Achola v Peter Otieno Opiyo & another [2005] KEHC 2416 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2416 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2416
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2416 (KLR)
Decided
13 May 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePersonal InjuryPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at NakuruCoramL. KIMARU
Holding

The defendants are found to be 100% liable for the accident and are ordered to pay the plaintiff Kshs 2,360,192 in general damages and special damages.

Facts

The plaintiff, Odema James Achola, was a teacher who was a passenger in a Nissan Matatu registration number KAJ 285H when the vehicle overturned on September 11, 1999, causing him serious injuries.

Issues

  1. whether the defendants owed the plaintiff a duty of care
  2. whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor applied
  3. the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and damages

Reasoning

The court found that the defendants were negligent in driving the vehicle at a high speed on a potholed road, leading to the accident. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitor was applicable.

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of Kshs 2,360,192.

Orders

  • The defendants are found to be 100% liable for the accident.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs 1,800,000 in general damages.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs 391,932 in damages for loss of future earnings.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs 168,260 in special damages.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs 3,500 per month for future nursing care.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs 10,887 per month for future earnings.
  • The plaintiff is awarded Kshs 168,260 in costs of treatment.
  • Interest on special damages is applied from the date of filing suit, and interest on general damages is applied from the date of judgment.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case