SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Minister for Lands and Settlement & 3 others ex parte Julius Kiboro Njogoo Mitugo [2005] KEHC 2484 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2484 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2484
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2484 (KLR)
Decided
3 June 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for leave to apply for an order of prohibition and an order for certiorariCoramJ G NYAMU
Holding

The application is struck out with costs to the respondents

Facts

The applicant sought an order of prohibition to stop and prohibit the respondents from surveying, subdividing, excising, registering dealings, transferring or otherwise dealing with LRNO N Tharaka/Marimanti/664. The application was supported by an affidavit of the exparte applicant dated 18th May 2004.

Issues

  1. The Notice of Motion is bad because it does not cite the Law Reform Act
  2. The reliefs claimed in the statement are at variance with the reliefs sought in the application and no leave to amend the statement has been sought or granted

Reasoning

The court found the Notice of Motion to be defective as it did not cite the Law Reform Act. The court also found that the reliefs claimed in the statement were at variance with the reliefs sought in the application and no leave to amend the statement was sought or granted. The court also found that the verifying affidavit was inadequate and the application was struck out.

Outcome

Struck out

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law Reform Act Cap 26 of the laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • COMMISSIONER GENERAL KENYA REVENUE AUTHORITY v SILVANO OWAKI T/A MIRENGA FILLING STATION KSM CA45 of 2000
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case