SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MSK. v SNK [2005] KEHC 2513 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2513 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2513
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2513 (KLR)
Decided
10 May 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDivorcePostureAppeal from a lower court decisionCoramM.A. Ang'awa
Holding

The court awards the petitioner a lump sum of Ksh.10,000,000 for maintenance and Ksh.10,000,000 for the minor daughter's schooling and care. The Gigiri property is transferred out right to the petitioner, and shares in companies are declared to be held in trust for the petitioner.

Facts

The petitioner and respondent were married in 1974 and had three children. The petitioner was evicted from their home by the respondent, leading to a divorce proceeding. The petitioner sought maintenance and property division.

Issues

  1. Maintenance for the petitioner and minor daughter
  2. Distribution of property
  3. Ownership of the Gigiri property
  4. Ownership of shares in companies

Reasoning

The court considers the case of Joy Octavia Hunting v Kenneth Malcon Hunting (1963) E.A 616, where a lump sum payment was sufficient and would stop the parties from dealing with each other in the future.

Outcome

Affirmed

Orders

  • Award of Ksh.10,000,000 for maintenance to the petitioner
  • Award of Ksh.10,000,000 for the minor daughter's schooling and care
  • Transfer of the Gigiri property to the petitioner
  • Declaration of shares in companies held in trust for the petitioner

Remedies

  • Maintenance for the petitioner and minor daughter
  • Distribution of property
  • Ownership of the Gigiri property
  • Ownership of shares in companies

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Matrimonial Causes Act
  • Married Women's Property Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Joy Octavia Hunting v Kenneth Malcon Hunting (1963) E.A 616
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case