SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Njogu t/a Njogu & Co. Advocates v Town Clerk,City Council of Nairobi [2005] KEHC 2562 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 2562 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2562
Citation
[2005] KEHC 2562 (KLR)
Decided
6 June 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for MandamusCoramM.J.A. EMUKULE
Holding

The applicant is entitled to the orders of Mandamus, but the respondent shall pay the balance of the decretal sums together with interest thereon by equal monthly installments at the rate of Kshs 200,000 from the 30th day of June 2005 until payment in full.

Facts

The plaintiff, David Njogu, sought orders of Mandamus to compel the Town Clerk, City Council of Nairobi to pay various sums of money, including interest, to the plaintiff. The respondent, the Town Clerk, proposed to pay the sums in installments of Kshs 500,000 or Kshs 300,000 per month.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the orders of Mandamus
  2. Whether the respondent may be allowed to pay the sums due by way of installments

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant is entitled to the orders of Mandamus, but the respondent's proposal to pay the sums in installments was not acceptable. The court granted the orders subject to the modification that the respondent shall pay the balance in installments.

Outcome

In favor of the applicant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the balance of the decretal sums together with interest thereon by equal monthly installments at the rate of Kshs 200,000 from the 30th day of June 2005 until payment in full.

Remedies

  • Mandamus

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Law Reform Act
  • Local Government Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case