SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Chief of Ageng’a Location & another Ex-Parte John Mambala Mari & another [2005] KEHC 3154 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 3154 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3154
Citation
[2005] KEHC 3154 (KLR)
Decided
8 April 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for quashing a decision made without jurisdictionCoramJ. K. SERGON
Holding

The Court allows the motion and quashes the decision made by the Chief of Agenga Location without jurisdiction.

Facts

A boundary dispute between registered owners of L.R. NO. SAMIA/BUDONGO/946 and L.R. NO. SAMIA/BUDONGO/947 was referred to the Chief of Agenga Location for arbitration. The Chief gave a decision altering the boundary between the parcels of land.

Issues

  1. Whether the Chief of Agenga Location had jurisdiction to hear and determine the boundary dispute.
  2. Whether the decision made by the Chief was made without jurisdiction.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal in KENYA NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL AND REPUBLIC EXPARTE GEOFFREY GATHENJI NJOROGE AND 9 OTHERS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 266 OF 1996 stated that only an order of certiorari can quash a decision made without jurisdiction. The Chief of Agenga Location did not have the jurisdiction to hear and determine the boundary dispute.

Outcome

The motion is allowed.

Orders

  • The decision of the Chief of Agenga Location is quashed.
  • Each party meets his or her own costs.

Remedies

  • Quashing of the decision made by the Chief of Agenga Location without jurisdiction.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Registered Land Act Cap 300 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • KENYA NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL AND REPUBLIC EXPARTE GEOFFREY GATHENJI NJOROGE AND 9 OTHERS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 266 OF 1996
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case