SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v District Land Registrar Nandi & another Ex-parte Kiprono Tegerei & another [2005] KEHC 3197 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 3197 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3197
Citation
[2005] KEHC 3197 (KLR)
Decided
26 April 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Judicial ReviewCoramDANIEL MUSINGA
Holding

Set aside the orders given on 15th March, 2004 and grant unconditional leave to the interested party/applicant to contest the application dated 10th March, 2004.

Facts

Kiprono Tegerei initiated a judicial review proceeding to quash the cancellation of his title deed and subsequent registration of the land in the name of the Republic. Tegerei passed away, and Jonathan K. Rono was substituted as the applicant. Rono then sought injunctions against the Republic.

Issues

  1. Consent orders issued without instructions
  2. Injunctions in a judicial review matter
  3. Nature of remedies sought

Reasoning

The judge found that the advocate entered into consent orders contrary to instructions and without notifying the client, leading to a finding of fraud or collusion. The judge also noted unusual aspects of the application, such as seeking injunctions in a judicial review matter and the finalisation of the judicial review matter.

Outcome

Allow the application dated 26th May, 2004 in its entirety and award costs to the interested party/applicant.

Orders

  • Set aside the orders given on 15th March, 2004
  • Grant unconditional leave to the interested party/applicant to contest the application dated 10th March, 2004

Remedies

  • Costs awarded to the interested party/applicant

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Succession Act
  • Registered Land Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case