SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

KAMOTHO WAIGANJO (Suing as the Liquidator/Trustee of DAWA PHARMACEUTICALS STAFF RETIREMENT BENEFITS SCHEME (in Liquidation)V DAWA PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED (In Receivership, ENGINEER GAKURU KANYANJA & ENGINEER GEORGE NYAGISERE (both applying as j (Civil Case 600 of 2004) [2005] KEHC 3375 (KLR) (2 March 2005)

[2005] KEHC 3375 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3375
Citation
[2005] KEHC 3375 (KLR)
Decided
2 March 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from an original trialCoramANYARA EMUKULE
Holding

The issues are to be framed and filed in Court within thirty (30) days of the orders herein, and the matter be fixed for hearing on a priority basis.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Kamotho Waiganjo, is the Liquidator/Trustee of DAWA Pharmaceuticals Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme in Liquidation. The Defendant, DAWA Pharmaceuticals Limited, is in Receivership. The Applicants, Engineer Gakuru Kanyanja and Engineer George Nyagisere, are the Receivers-Managers of DAWA Pharmaceuticals Limited.

Issues

  1. Declaration that the amount payable to workers under a retirement benefits scheme are preferred debts payable in priority to other debts including those of secured creditors.
  2. Status of H.C.C.C. 1667 of 2001 and its impact on the Originating Summons herein.

Reasoning

The application is predicated on the provisions of Order XXXVI rules 8A, 8B and 12, which allow any party to a suit by originating summons to apply for directions. The Court directs that parties formulate specific issues in relation to the matters set out in the Originating Summons and Replying Affidavit.

Outcome

The matter is fixed for hearing on a priority basis.

Orders

  • Directing parties to frame specific issues in relation to the matters set out in the Originating Summons and Replying Affidavit.
  • Directing parties to file the issues within thirty (30) days of the orders herein.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case