SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lazarus Mukuta Kaleve v Philip Ngili Muthunga & another [2005] KEHC 901 (KLR)

[2005] KEHC 901 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
901
Citation
[2005] KEHC 901 (KLR)
Decided
21 April 2005
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks transfer of case to High Court in Machakos for trial and disposalCoramR. V. WENDOH
Holding

The application for transfer is granted, and the case will be transferred to Machakos Chief Magistrate's Court for the application dated 10.1.2005 on merit and any other application that may follow. The applicant will bear costs of the application dated 3.2.2005.

Facts

The defendants/applicants were aggrieved by a judgement in a civil case in Kitui Court and sought to set it aside. The plaintiff/respondent opposed the application, stating that the defendants/applicants should have appealed instead.

Issues

  1. Transfer of case from Principal Magistrate's Civil Case 107/2004 Kitui Court to High Court in Machakos
  2. Whether the application to set aside the judgement was brought in bad faith

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion to transfer the case due to the defendants/applicants' failure to act diligently and with haste in setting aside the interlocutory judgement, and the fact that the case was finalised with a judgement and costs assessed.

Outcome

Transfer granted

Orders

  • Transfer of Principal Magistrate Civil Case 107/2004 to Machakos Chief Magistrate's Court for the application dated 10.1.2005 on merit and any other application that may follow

Remedies

  • Costs of the application dated 3.2.2005 to be borne by the applicant

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case