SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MOHAMED ZAFAR NIAZ & 2 others v PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION [2006] KEHC 1082 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 1082 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1082
Citation
[2006] KEHC 1082 (KLR)
Decided
13 October 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureRespondent did not file any papers in reply to the Notice of MotionCoramR.P.V. WENDOH
Holding

The Permanent Secretary's decision to cancel the old certificate and reduce the number of students is quashed by order of certiorari.

Facts

The applicants, Mohamed Zafer Niaz, Saeed Chaudry, and Waheed Chaudry, are the Chairman, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Islamia Madrassa Society. The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education, issued a decision to cancel the registration of the Muslim Academy and reduce the number of students.

Issues

  1. Did the Permanent Secretary violate the provisions of the Education Act?
  2. Did the Permanent Secretary act ultra vires the provisions of Section 14 and 15 of the Education Act?
  3. Was the Permanent Secretary's decision to cancel the old certificate unreasonable?
  4. Was the Permanent Secretary in breach of the Rules of Natural Justice?

Reasoning

The Permanent Secretary acted ultra vires and did not give the applicant a notice or hearing before making the decision. The decision was made in bad faith and falls under the Wednesbury Principle of unreasonableness.

Outcome

The ex parte applicants are granted the first prayer of the Notice of Motion with costs.

Orders

  • Order of certiorari to quash the decision of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education dated 23rd January 2006

Remedies

  • Quashing of the decision by order of certiorari

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Education Act
  • Interpretation and General Provisions Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case