SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC v CHAIRMAN LICENSING COURT & 2 others [2006] KEHC 1806 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 1806 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1806
Citation
[2006] KEHC 1806 (KLR)
Decided
12 July 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureRespondent cancelled applicant's liquor licence; applicant sought to set aside the cancellation and for costs.CoramM. K. IBRAHIM
Holding

The court grants prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the Application amended on 8th June, 2006. The 1st respondent shall pay the Applicant’s costs.

Facts

The applicant's liquor licence was cancelled by the Chairman of the Licensing Court on 29th June, 2005, due to the premises being in a residential area and constituting a public nuisance and creating insecurity. No objection was served on the applicant, and no hearing took place.

Issues

  1. Whether the cancellation of the applicant's liquor licence was in violation of statutory provisions and principles of natural justice.
  2. Whether the applicant should be granted the prayers in the amended application.

Reasoning

The cancellation of the applicant's liquor licence was in violation of section 12 of the Liquor Licencing Act and the principles of natural justice. The Chairman of the Licensing Court must follow due process and the law when revoking a licence.

Outcome

The applicant's liquor licence was set aside, and the 1st respondent was ordered to pay the applicant's costs.

Orders

  • The applicant's liquor licence is set aside.
  • The 1st respondent shall pay the applicant's costs.

Remedies

  • Set aside the cancellation of the applicant's liquor licence.
  • Order the 1st respondent to pay the applicant's costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Liquor Licencing Act
  • Principles of natural justice
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case