SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

AMOS KINUTHIA & ANOTHER v UNGA LIMITED [2006] KEHC 2143 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2143 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2143
Citation
[2006] KEHC 2143 (KLR)
Decided
14 June 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) Civil Case 898 of 1985.CoramMayers, Mbaluto, Musinga
Holding

The lease agreement was valid, and the plaintiffs' claim for damages was upheld.

Facts

A business named 'Burget Spray Works' was registered. Unga Limited, acting on the defendant's instructions, offered to let the defendant's property to a firm called 'Budget Spray Works'. The terms of the lease were agreed upon, and the plaintiffs paid the first month's rent and were put in possession of the premises. However, the plaintiffs ceased operations and claimed damages for loss of machinery, equipment, and anticipated profits.

Issues

  1. The validity of the lease agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant.
  2. The plaintiffs' claim for damages for the loss of machinery, equipment, and anticipated profits.

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiffs had validly entered into the lease agreement and that the defendant had not breached it. The court also ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on their claim for damages.

Outcome

The plaintiffs' claim for damages was upheld.

Orders

  • The plaintiffs' claim for damages was upheld.
  • The lease agreement was valid.

Remedies

  • Damages were awarded to the plaintiffs.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case