SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Loghan Njenga Waweru v Damaris Muga Kamure & another [2006] KEHC 2190 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2190 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2190
Citation
[2006] KEHC 2190 (KLR)
Decided
28 April 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeReal Property DisputePostureDefault Judgment followed by Judgment for PlaintiffCoramMARTHA KOOME
Holding

The Court declared that the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of the land parcel Molo South/Langwenda Block 12/423 and ordered the cancellation of the title deed issued to the Defendant and the issuance of a new title deed to the Plaintiff.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Longhan Njenga Waweru, claimed that he was the rightful owner of land parcel Molo South/Langwenda Block 12/423, which was previously owned by Damaris Muga Kamure. The Plaintiff alleged that he had been a member of Ndeffo Co. Limited since 1975 and had been in uninterrupted possession of the land since then.

Issues

  1. Declaration that the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of the land
  2. Cancellation of the title deed issued to the Defendant and issuance of a new title deed to the Plaintiff

Reasoning

The Court found that the Plaintiff had been a member of Ndeffo Co. Limited since 1975 and had been in uninterrupted possession of the land since then. The Court also found that the title deed issued to the Defendant was irregular and ordered its cancellation.

Outcome

Plaintiff's claim for declaration and cancellation of title deed was granted.

Orders

  • Declaration that the Plaintiff is the rightful owner of the land parcel Molo South/Langwenda Block 12/423
  • Cancellation of the title deed issued to the Defendant and issuance of a new title deed to the Plaintiff
  • Plaintiff to be awarded the costs of the suit

Remedies

  • Declaration of ownership
  • Cancellation of irregular title deed
  • Award of costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case