SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

REPUBLIC v Permanent Secretary MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Ex-parte Mwangi S. Kimenyi [2006] KEHC 2245 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2245 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2245
Citation
[2006] KEHC 2245 (KLR)
Decided
9 June 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeApplication for Orders of Certiorari, Prohibition and MandamusPostureRespondent's opposition to applicant's application for orders of certiorari, prohibition and mandamusCoramJ.G. NYAMU
Holding

The court grants the application for leave to amend the Statement and Notice of Motion and orders the matter to be heard on the merits.

Facts

The applicant seeks to enjoin KIPPRA (Kenya Institute for Public Policy and Research) and grant leave to amend the Statement and Notice of Motion. KIPPRA opposes the amendment due to lack of leave and delay.

Issues

  1. Whether leave to amend the Statement and Notice of Motion is granted
  2. Whether the applicant can be enjoined against KIPPRA

Reasoning

The court allows the amendment as it is within the scope of judicial review rules and the applicant can be heard on the merits.

Outcome

Grant of leave to amend the Statement and Notice of Motion

Orders

  • Orders in terms of prayer 1 of the application dated 9th December, 2005
  • Orders in terms of prayer 2 of the application pursuant to O 53 rule 4 (2) as regards the statement
  • Orders in terms of prayer 2 as regards the Notice of Motion pursuant to the inherent powers of this court
  • Orders in terms of prayer 3 pursuant to O 53 3 (3) and the inherent powers of this court

Remedies

  • Grant of leave to amend the Statement and Notice of Motion

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • State Corporations Act
  • Judicial Review Rules
Cases cited (1)
  • ALFRED ROMANO & 3 OTHERS v amE.C.A. CA NO. NAI 375 OF 2002
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case