SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MUTUNGA & MUINDI ADVOCATES v M/S BUSSCAR LIMITED [2006] KEHC 2382 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2382 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2382
Citation
[2006] KEHC 2382 (KLR)
Decided
7 June 2006
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSummary JudgmentPostureApplication for Summary JudgmentCoramFRED A. OCHIENG
Holding

The court grants summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff for KShs.188,775/=, with interest at 9% per annum from 8th August, 2005, until settlement in full. The plaintiff is also awarded the costs of the application.

Facts

The plaintiff, a firm of advocates, sought summary judgment against their erstwhile clients, M/S Busscar Limited, for the sum specified in a certificate of taxation. The client raised a preliminary objection, but the court ruled that the consent order in a previous case was binding.

Issues

  1. Binding nature of the consent order
  2. Claim for interest on taxed costs

Reasoning

The court dismissed the client's objection to the consent order, which was binding on the case. The court ruled that the plaintiff is entitled to interest on the taxed costs from the date the bill was presented for payment, and that the client is responsible for paying interest from 30 days after the ruling on taxation was delivered.

Outcome

In favor of the plaintiff

Orders

  • Judgment in favor of the plaintiff for KShs.188,775/=
  • Award of costs of the application

Remedies

  • Interest on taxed costs from 8th August, 2005
  • Award of costs of the application

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Advocates (Remuneration) Order
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case